Think Aloud

Month

September 2012

1 post

A Quick Thought (TW: Comments which take rape lightly)

Sometimes I forget I write for a blog (a mostly dead blog, but which I can resuscitate at will) where I can easily share ideas like this to a sizable audience…

We can generally agree that it is bad to say things like “I totally raped that test!” or “I raped that level in Angry Birds.” because that is not what rape means, and rape is a serious thing.

But one additional problem with the particular quotes above is that tests and video game levels are not sentient beings.  They do not have agency to ignore or consciousness to torment.  

Tests exist to be taken, and games exist to be played.  But people do not exist to be raped.  And “winning” is no great personal feat.  Using the word rape in this way strips the humanity from those who have been raped, much like their rapists did, by making them equivalent to objects which lack everything that makes rape bad. 

So, you know, don’t say things like that!  

<3 Audrey

Sep 15, 20124 notes

January 2012

8 posts

Jan 7, 2012457 notes
You don't say?: 15 Crazy Things About Vaginas → alas-ihavesaiditagain.tumblr.com

alas-ihavesaiditagain:

It’s amazing how much misinformation is out there about the vagina. Given how fascinated our society is with the female body, you’d think we’d be a little more informed. But from what I discovered while soliciting questions for my book What’s Up Down There? Questions You’d Only Ask Your…

Jan 5, 20122,360 notes
Your Genes? My Body.: My Body, My Choice → yourgenes-mybody.tumblr.com

iamwhoiamandidontgiveadamn:

When people say this they are usually referring to the abortion debate. But I think of SO many other things when I hear this phrase. I think about how every day, there is SOMEONE telling me what to do with my body, how to see my body, how to feel about my body….

…

Jan 3, 201276 notes
I've only been able to recently call people out on the invasive questioning of trans* folks.
  • Me: Well, I'm transgender.
  • Coworker: So, wait. What?
  • Me: Everyone is gendered at birth if they're born in a hospital. I was gendered female.
  • Coworker: So do you.. -
  • Me: You mean what's in my pants?
  • Coworker: Well, I was going to put it more nicely, but yeah basically.
  • Me: You're asking me something really personal and private in front of other people that you would never ask anyone else because I'm transgender. Do you realize that?
  • Coworker: When you put it like that, it makes me sound like a jerk.
  • Me: Is that not what's happening?
  • Coworker: ...
Jan 3, 2012895 notes
Jan 2, 201265,283 notes
Softening and Sexualizing of Lisbeth Salander → ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com

thesexuneducated:

Very interesting article. I have yet to see the American version of the film, but am interested to see if any of this correlates. This film is very controversial, especially within a feminist context, as many of you know. I will definitely be reporting once I see it. What are any of your thoughts on Fincher’s “Girl With The Dragon Tattoo”?

I’ve seen the American version, but only about half of the Swedish film.  I still agree with this article’s criticism of the American portrayal of Lisbeth.  The final line sums it up nicely:
“The film was not made by men who hate women, but certainly by men who are more comfortable with women as love interests for male heroes”

<3 Audrey

Jan 2, 201292 notes

microaggressions:

The same type of gloves is marketed as “sniper gloves” to men but “texting gloves” to women.

Jan 2, 2012107 notes
Jan 1, 20125,667 notes

December 2011

4 posts

Dec 30, 20111 note
“Realize that anyone who tries to put you down about your appearance is assuming that it is your job to please them visually. Once you realize that it isn’t your job to be visually pleasing to anyone, ever, it becomes very hard for anyone to make you feel bad about yourself.” —

Skeptifem (in this interview: http://teenskepchick.org/2011/07/14/teen-skepchick-interviews-skeptifem/

)

Dec 27, 201141,611 notes
Translated: One teachers approach to preventing gender bullying in a classroom → williamjh.tumblr.com

togetherforjacksoncountykids:

“It’s Okay to be Neither,” By Melissa Bollow Tempel

Alie arrived at our 1st-grade classroom wearing a sweatshirt with a hood. I asked her to take off her hood, and she refused. I thought she was just being difficult and ignored it. After breakfast we got…

Dec 26, 201138,415 notes
The Slut Word

There’s been a bit of a break in posts because we’ve all been super busy with school in session, but I just want to clarify something:

It is perfectly acceptable to behave “like a slut.”

It is perfectly acceptable to embrace the term slut, to call yourself a slut and mean it positively.

It is UNacceptable to assume other people want to be called sluts, regardless of your own feelings about the term.  It is SUPER UNacceptable to think (and, certainly, to say) that a person is ashamed or sex-negative if they ask to not be called a slut.

Do not call me a slut, please.

That is all.  Hopefully more posts to come over Winter Break!

<3 Audrey

Dec 18, 201112 notes
#slut shaming #don't-call-me-a-slut shaming

November 2011

0 posts

If feminist thought were to screen feminist films, what would you be interested in seeing/discussing?

Daughters of the Dust? The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter? Kill Bill? Legally Blonde?

Oct 31, 20113 notes
#feminist thought #feminism #film #columbia university #barnard college #barnard #events

September 2011

9 posts

feministpizza:

“Queer Sex Doesn’t Count” And Nine Other Myths Uncovered- And Debunked- at the Harvard “Rethinking Virginity” Conference

projectqueer:

pansexualpride:

Myth #1: The hymen is THE definitive marker of virginity. There is no one physical trait that indicates virginity or sexual activity- not even the presence of a “hymen.” I put hymen in quotes because I’ve come to learn that it is really a nebulous entity. At yesterday’s conference, Professor Kathleen Kelly of Northeastern University discussed the history of the hymen and highlighted the way our understanding of the hymen has become misinformed. As she puts it:

“What we recognize as the hymen today was not always considered as such….If we trace the etymology of the word hymen from Greek through Latin to English, we can observe how the word progressively narrows in meaning, first denoting any sort of bodily membrane, then referring to the womb, and finally coming to mean almost exclusively “virginal membrane” in the early modern period. ..The hymen is an overdetermined, widely misunderstood sign precisely because it has never been a fixed part of anatomy…the hymen is both an anatomical part and a metonym.”

So it’s- surprise!- incredibly oversimplified to think that there is some magical vaginal barrier that only virgins have. Sometimes it works like that, sometimes it doesn’t. In part for this reason, back in December, a Swedish sexual rights group renamed the hymen the “vaginal corona.” Food for thought.

Myth #2: Valuing virginity protects girls and women. Nope, valuing virginity puts girls and women at risk of violence, abuse, and assault by members of a society that believes a woman’s worth lies in her sexual behavior. As I discussed on my panel, violations of girls’ and women’s sexual and reproductive rights and health occur every day in the name of preserving and protecting girls’ virginity, delaying sexual activity, or controlling the circumstances under which girls and women lose their virginity. From forced child marriage, female genital cutting, and breast ironing to slut-shaming to the deliberate withholding of information on reproductive and sexual health, the emphasis on preserving virginity has pernicious consequences for girls in the West and beyond. I can do without that kind of “protection” thanks very much.

Myth #3: Queer sex doesn’t “count”. As the panelists yesterday pointed out, heterosexual vaginal intercourse is often privileged above other sexual acts because of its association with reproduction (and because of good old-fashioned heteronormativity and homophobia), and so people often rely on a problematic concept of “virginity” that can exclude, marginalize, and ignore the experiences of queer folk. But in rethinking virginity yesterday, panelists said: F that! It’s important for us to create and reinforce alternatives to this heteronormative penetration-focused view of virginity and how it’s “lost”. What about a female-bodied person whose sexuality does not involve being penetrated? Are her sexual experiences somehow less valid? Part of rethinking virginity has to include incorporating a more nuanced and more queer-friendly concept of sex and virginity that doesn’t serve to devalue the experience of any person or group of people.

Myth #4: You can only “lose it” once. This myth is false on a number of levels. First of all, the term “losing your virginity” is problematic, as it suggests that something is inherently lost as a result of sex and therefore engages in slut shaming. Secondly, many people find the idea that you can only experience something new once to be limiting and/or oppressive. The alternative concept of having multiple virginities was talked about a lot yesterday- some found this concept useful and meaningful, some less so. The idea is that there’s a first time for lots of things, not just penetrative vaginal intercourse, thus, we all have multiple virginities to lose over the course of our sexual lifetimes as we take part in new sexual experiences that are meaningful to us. I find this concept useful because it’s not specific to one particular kind of behavior, and emphasizes sexuality as an ongoing journey rather than an all-or-nothing situation in which you’re either completely abstinent or fully sexually active. It also seems to make more room for queer folks whose sexuality includes being attracted to more than one sex or gender, as well as trans people who may have had sex before transitioning as one gender, but have yet to experience sex as another gender, and anyone else who has had what they define as sex in the past but feels for some reason they now approach the same activity from a new mindset or attitude.

Myth #5: Sex within marriage is the “healthiest” kind. Unfortunately, a marriage license isn’t a magical key to a “healthy” and pleasurable sex life. In fact, sex within marriage is not even always consensual, and sadly, rape occurs within the institution of marriage every day. Remaining a virgin until marriage doesn’t guarantee a “healthy” sex life any more than having sex before marriage does.

Myth #6: There’s one universal definition of sex. This one’s also false. In fact, there seem to be just about as many definitions of sex as there are people in this world. Among yesterday’s conference participants, some people thought oral sex should be considered sex, and some people didn’t. Some people thought the context of the situation determined whether or not it was sex- for example, if proper consent was obtained for a certain act (Some survivors of forced first intercourse identify as virgins because they consider rape to be an act of violence, not sex). Others took into consideration whether or not the partners had intended to “go further” but were interrupted for some reason. Some common factors that folks seemed to take into account when deciding whether something “counts” as sex or not:
-when and how consent was obtained
-number of partners
-existence of orgasm and/or ejaculation
-length of time engaged in activity
-intentions of the people involved
Perhaps most importantly, we established that even though there are many different ideas of what “sex” is, my definition of sex and your definition of sex can coexist simultaneously. One doesn’t invalidate the other.

Myth #7: Slut-shaming plays an important social role by discouraging “risky” behavior. Um, yeah. This is actually a more prevalent idea than you might think. We’ve covered this a lot here at Feministing, so I’ll keep it brief: Slut-shaming (as opposed to educating and empowering by providing comprehensive sexuality education) doesn’t discourage risky behavior or encourage healthy sex, it simply perpetuates a culture of shame, fear, and silence around sex and sexuality that has very real and dangerous ramifications for everyone, not just girls and women. Also, it’s important to note that while feminists have talked a lot about the harmful nature of slut-shaming, virgin shaming can be just as harmful, and is something we need to actively discourage as well.

Myth #8: Teens should learn that sex is dangerous so they won’t put themselves at risk for unwanted pregnancy and/or STIs. This myth is so pervasive that the government has bought into it: all federally funded sex ed is currently obligated by law to teach that sex before marriage will do psychological, physical, and emotional harm. It’s true that sex has consequences, and unsafe sex can be deadly. We need not look far to be reminded of this- HIV infection rates are unacceptably, devastatingly high, and we are in the midst of a global epidemic. Yet our response must not be to spread fear and misinformation. Physical risk can be mitigated with reliable facts and access to services and contraception. And arguments about the emotional consequences of sex won’t ring true for anyone who knows the great pleasure and intimacy that can come as a result of sexual activity- including teens- unless it paints a more accurate and comprehensive picture of the wide range of emotions that can come as a result of engaging in a sexual relationship with a partner, rather than making blanket statements about what teens might feel based on pseudo science and moral judgments. We must arm our youth with the skills they need to navigate their sexual lives with safety and emotional maturity. Why are we traumatizing the next generation with misinformation and scare tactics? Let’s stop policing people’s sexualities and start educating them to make informed decisions about their bodies and their lives.

Myth #9: Teens don’t want to talk about sex with their parents. As the ever-sharp Shelby Knox pointed out, surveys consistently show that teens would prefer to receive sexuality education from their parents. And when you don’t have a community that supports you, no amount of sex ed in the world will suffice.

Myth #10: There is no such thing as sex-positive abstinence. This myth is sometimes even found in feminist circles when people assume that abstinence can’t be taught as part of a comprehensive sexuality curriculum. This is false. When included as part of a comprehensive and factually accurate program, abstinence can and should be taught as an excellent method of birth control and STI prevention, as well as a valid and legitimate choice for sexual beings of any age. In fact, this is a crucial part of any sex positive curriculum.The unfortunate prevalence of this myth is indicative of a much greater need for inclusivity and sex positivity in sexuality education: now that we know that our ideas and experiences about sex and virginity aren’t as simple as they seem, sexuality education programs really need to catch up and become more inclusive of a fluid range of experiences, sexualities, and attitudes about sex.

Sep 2, 20111,076 notes
#queer sex #myths #Harvard #lgbtq myths #uncovering myths #pansexual pride #lgbtq
Sep 2, 20113,162 notes
#femininity #feminism #gender roles
Sep 1, 2011276 notes
#sexism #feminism #girls #clothing #fashion
Elmhurst College's Sexual Orientation Application Question First In The Nation → huffingtonpost.com

Elmhurst College, a private liberal arts school located in the western suburbs of Chicago, this week released a new undergraduate application [PDF] for its 2012-2013 academic year including a reportedly historic question: “Would you consider yourself to be a member of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered) community?”

…

The question is an optional one for prospective students to fill out on the newly designed application, and also offers a “prefer not to say” option. It appears in a series of questions asking applicants about their religious affiliation, languages other than English spoken in their home and other questions school administrators hope will help identify students’ needs and potential interest in campus programs and resources, according to Campus Pride. In this case, students could be put in touch with a student club called Straights and Gays for Equality (SAGE).

I don’t know how to feel about this. My knee-jerk reaction was “wtf?” but they’re apparently doing it for a good reason, rather than a discriminatory one? All the same, I think Common App’s objection: 

“any potential benefits to adding the question would be outweighed by the anxiety and uncertainty students may experience when deciding if and how they should answer it,”

Is a valid one. If they’re going to include such a question on an application, they should definitely explain upfront why it’s being asked. Otherwise I’m sure I wouldn’t be the only person with that first reaction. At any rate, it’s good to see a college publicly doing something for LGBTQ students.

M.M.

Btw—sorry for the dashboard flood, all. I just got internet at my house after a week of being without because we moved. 

Sep 1, 20113 notes
#lgbtq #sexuality #education #feminism
A fabulous website with gender identities, sexual orientations and definitions → jilliancottle.com
Sep 1, 2011273 notes
#gender #sexuality #gender identity #gay #lesbian #bisexual #asexual #pansexual #demisexual #gray-sexual #omnisexual #polysexual #queer #genderless #agender #woman #man #androgynous #bigender #trigender #genderfluid #polygender #pangender #genderqueer
On Tyler, the Creator → alcoholicsconspicuous.wordpress.com

pubicbone:

feministthought:

You might be a genius, dood. You really might be. But ironically using words like faggot and bitch,and rapping about raping sluts has the same effect as just regularly saying them. Especially to your fans. Believe me, irony is something so easily lost in translation. Especially on teenagers. Don’t believe me? Try teaching them about the dramatic irony in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet when Romeo drinks the poison thinking that Juliet is dead, but like, we all know she’s not really dead. Whoosh. That’s the sound it’ll make.

Found this while looking for more info on Eric D. Angell (see previous post). Great breakdown of why “ironic misogyny” is usually not ironic and never really very clever.

M.M.

 I totally agree. But where it says  ’especially on teenagers’ and grouping teenagers by using the word ‘them’ and stuff isn’t my thing. But i do understand it means teenagers in a general sense.

Oh, definitely, pubicbone. I never considered dramatic irony very difficult to understand—we know what’s going on, the characters don’t. The end—so I wouldn’t say that’s the best example. Verbal irony, however, especially in an industry already saturated with misogyny, is hard to immediately identify even for those of us receiving a degree in English. That’s why this whole “ironic misogyny” thing bothers me—irony is so hard to define, it feels like sometimes the people who say they’re “being ironic” are in fact just looking for a way to act douche-y with impunity.

M.M.

Sep 1, 201123 notes
#misogyny in media #tyler the creator #rap #feminism
Next page →
2011 2012
  • January 8
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September 1
  • October
  • November
  • December
2010 2011 2012
  • January 41
  • February 55
  • March 45
  • April 13
  • May 56
  • June 54
  • July 9
  • August 27
  • September 9
  • October 1
  • November
  • December 4
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December 31